My SM2 Loses Its Bearing...Or Does It?

Here's the bearing. Anybody have any...uh...'bearing' on where it might belong inside the SM2?

And a cropped close-up, 'cos what's a post without a coupla' pics?

Thanks all!

Three Seiko Dive Watches

When I put up that picture of my Seiko Dive watch in my previous post the other day, I got to thinking that I should do a quick write-up on this watch, plus the other two Seikos that I have.

Having read Rob Bowker's nice post about his own Seiko wristwatch;

T42

...I felt inspired to write about my own Seiko wristwatches. I'm already working on another sprawling review of a different watch, but thought it might be an idea to get back into watch-writing mode by writing about these fantastic watches from Japan.

 

 

Up above is how it looked when it arrived. Definitely has plenty of Seiko DNA in its design, but the three-link bracelet was a little too Rolexy for my liking (with this watch, anyway), so out came the tools and off came the bracelet.
Here's the Oyster bracelet, as equipped on a Rolex Submariner;



picture courtesy of Valet.com- Anatomy of a Classic; The Rolex Submariner

If I'd wanted a watch to look like a Rolex Submariner, I'd get myself a Rolex Submariner. One day. So, off came the bracelet and on went a nylon ZULU strap;

Just quickly, ZULU straps are basically the US military's version of the British Ministry of Defence-approved NATO strap. The main difference is the shape of the hardware. The ZULUs have oval-shaped rings, whereas the NATOs will have rectangular fittings.

 

 

If you want to read about the Grand Seiko series, follow this link to a recent article about the newly-released 44GS model;

 

Redefining A Classic- Introducing The New Grand Seiko 44GS

 

About six or seven years ago, I saw another Seiko model that looked really cool. Its design was very much made up of sharp, straight lines and there was a nice attention to detail throughout this watch. It was known as the Seiko Prospex Air Diver Titanium 200 (Model No. SBDA003), but collectors soon began referring to it as The Seiko Samurai.

 

 

A very angular design, it looks like it would be perfectly at home on some Japanese Anime character's wrist in the year 2072.

 

And because the case and bracelet are made of titanium, it makes for a very light watch to wear.

 

And this watch shows some nice attention to detail on Seiko's part. The dial is nicely legible and luminous in low-light. The bezel edge and winding crown are knurled for easy gripping with wet or dry hands. Looking closely at the chapter ring (that's the ring on the outer edge of the dial), you notice that the hour marker batons tuck slightly into these little notches cut into the chapter ring. It's a nice little touch. 

 



 The movement inside this watch is the Calibre 7S25. It's similar to the movement inside the Seiko SKX031 model mentioned above, but this Samurai model shows the date only. Timekeeping is, once again, a little fluid.

 

This Samurai series was only in production for a few short years and, as a result, there is some demand amongst collectors for these watches.

And, of course, now that I know this, I rarely wear it.

 

Once you begin reading up about Seiko dive watches, you will invariably land on the 7002 models that were produced throughout the '80s and '90s. (Don't quote me on the veracity of that sentence. I'm talking in ball-park terms, since I'm no expert on vintage Seiko). Their design harks back to models from the 1970s and they are instantly recognisable by many with an interest in wristwatches due to the crown placement on the case.

 

Since my taste in wristwatches leans towards classic models, I began looking at these on eBay and found a slew of them for sale. They are readily available. At the time of writing, a quick search for a 7002 brings up almost 300 listings for watches and spare parts.

Since I already had two Seiko dive watches, I had a pretty strict criteria for my next one; it had to be cheap. I was planning to modify this watch, so I didn't want to spend too much. As luck would have it, I got one off eBay for $40 bucks. Not too shabby. I read around on some Seiko watch forums and was told that modifying these old dive watches could indeed be a slippery slope. I bought two new dials for it, as well as a new set of hands.

 

Here's how it looked shortly after it arrived. According to the seller, the serial number dates this watch back to around May, 1993, so it's already 20 years old now.

I wanted to change the hands because they were exactly the same as what I had on my other Seiko Diver.

 

 

 

This watch houses the 7000 series movement. It was produced cheaply throughout the 80s and 90s and, while it doesn't command the same respect as the previous 6309 Calibre, it is still a work-horse movement. My one loses around two minutes a day, but some slight tinkering could bring that down a little. However, this isn't something that bothers me with this watch. It's a leisure-time watch, so if it's out by a couple of minutes, it's no big deal.

 

I had decided to make modifications to this watch because I was going for a certain look. The IWC Aquatimer Chronograph had just been released...

 

 

...and I liked the colour combo of blue and orange. So, I got onto eBay and snagged these two dials and swapped around the chapter rings...

 

 

 

...with the intention of using the blue dial and the orange ring. While it wasn't the same shade of blue as the IWC, it would do nicely.

Of course, this was not enough. I wanted this watch to have different hands as well, since the ones on it were the same design as my first Seiko diver. I was also wanting to mimic a classic Tudor dive watch design from the Sixties and Seventies, the famous, and highly sought-after Tudor 'Snowflake' Submariner...

 

Picture courtesy of...actually, I got this picture off the web so long ago that I don't remember where it came from.

 

 

The Tudor Prince OysterDate Submariner watch above was French military-issue back in the early 1970s. If you ever see a blue-dialled model with this style of hands, grab it! It ain't cheap, but it's rare.

It was nicknamed the 'Snowflake' due to the little square design on the hour hand.

 

Okay, the hands arrived, so I took them, the dials and the watch to my watchmaker for the necessary swap-over.

And this was the end-result;

 

 



 I opted for an orange minute hand, since it was a common practice for watch manufacturers to use orange for the minute hand to help differentiate it from the hour hand for diving purposes. And, once it was done, I put it on this strap, and I consider this to be the biggest mistake that I made;

 

 

I got this NATO strap from Fossil. Notice the rectangular hardware instead of oval-shaped rings as found on ZULU straps. It's well made and all, and the colours match the watch nicely, but it just...uh...'Tommy Hilfigers' it up a little too much.

 

Stupidly, I took it back to the watchmaker and had the black dial put back on, leaving the hands in place. What I should have done is remove the strap...and burned it. It's not a huge drama, since I can have the blue dial put back on, especially now that I have since purchased a Seiko steel bracelet for it. It would look quite neat on the bracelet.

Ahh, well, I'll get around to it someday.  I spent more on the modification parts than I did on the actual watch.

The Seiko collectors told me that would happen.

 

Seiko make great watches, without a doubt. Of the Japanese brands, I consider them to be the best, and when this company pulls out all stops, it manufactures a watch that gives many a Swiss brand a run for its money. Their watches can be had for as little as $80 or $90 for a plain dialled quartz watch that will be a dependable timekeeper. A quick search on eBay shows a few Seiko 5 Series automatic models selling for under $70, with many of them under a hundred dollars. They are a great value brand of wristwatch and cheap enough that one could amass a small collection of them without trying too hard or breaking the bank.

I have to hand it to the Seiko brand for its ability to create a wide range of wristwatches in many different styles and price points. This helps ensure that wristwatches remain both affordable and accessible.

 

 

 

Thanks for reading!

 

 

This Blog Is Two Years Old!

Another attempt at a letterhead. Or is it a footer?

Here's the Olivetti Lettera 32 photographed with the 'Dramatic' filter setting. 

 

Here's the first issue of 'Premiere' magazine that I bought in April 1990.

And here's the last issue from April 2007 when this great magazine folded. And I had every issue in between.

The Lettera 32 was my first typewriter. This Olympia SM9 is my latest. I had to wrap up this post as soon as the sun began to shine. There was a fence outside that needed painting.

And the same picture again with the filter set to 'Key Line' to make it look nifty and cartoon-like.

The watch in the picture up above is my circa 1962 Omega Seamaster. No way was I gonna wear this watch while painting.  I had it on one day when I came off my (mountain) bike. Instinctively, I covered the watch with my right hand as I fell.
So, if there's any risk of damage, I tend to switch to this Seiko Automatic (Model No. SKX031). Timekeeping-wise, it's a little bit...'relaxed'. It can gain or lose anywhere from 15 to 30 seconds per day, but these things will run twenty years without necessarily requiring a service. You could probably clamp this watch around a hand-grenade and pull the pin and it will still tick afterwards.

 Thanks for reading over the last couple of years, folks!

"Casablanca" and The Other Four Best Movies EVER Made...In My Humble Opinion. Part 1

 My Top Three favourite movies of all time used to be "Casablanca", "It's A Wonderful Life" and "Chinatown". In recent years, however, Frank Capra's timeless Christmas tale has been usurped by one of Howard Hawks' best films, "His Girl Friday". Rounding out the Top Five, then, are the Capra film and Alfred Hitchcock's "North By Northwest".

#1

                                Directed by Michael Curtiz
              Warner Bros., 1942
               Screenplay by Julius J. Epstein,              
                Philip G. Epstein, Howard Koch
                 and Casey Robinson (uncredited).
                  Based on "Everybody Comes to Rick's"
                   by Murray Burnett and Joan Alison.

The story centres around Rick Blaine (Humphrey Bogart), an American, who runs a casino/bar in unoccupied Morocco during the Second World War. Complications arise when Rick's old flame, Ilsa Lund (Ingrid Bergman), arrives in Casablanca with her new lover, a Resistance fighter named Victor Laszlo (Paul Henreid), whose presence unnerves the recently-arrived Nazi Official, Major Strasser (Conrad Veidt) who is intent on arresting him. Strasser is in Casablanca to investigate the murder of two German couriers who were carrying letters of transit, which allow the bearer freedom to travel throughout neutral territories. These letters of transit are now somewhere in Casablanca and Laszlo is out to get them so that he can carry on his Resistance work.

Rick remains neutral as both the German High Command and the French Vichy Prefect of Police, Renault (Claude Rains), try to get a bead on what makes him tick and where his loyalties lie.

Here's a scene from a transcript of the screenplay. It's one of the beautifully-written exchanges that populate this entire film;

                                     RENAULT
                         I have often speculated on why you
                         don't return to America. Did you
                         abscond with the church funds? Did
                         you run off with a senator's wife? I
                         like to think you killed a man. It's
                         the romantic in me.

               Rick still looks in the direction of the airport.

                                     RICK
                         It was a combination of all three.

                                     RENAULT
                         And what in heaven's name brought
                         you to Casablanca?

                                     RICK
                         My health. I came to Casablanca for
                         the waters.

                                     RENAULT
                         Waters? What waters? We're in the
                         desert.

                                     RICK
                         I was misinformed.

The template for the character of Rick Blaine was described as "two parts Hemingway, one part Scott-Fitzgerald". He was to be smooth and urbane, but with a tough and cynical core. The casting of Humphrey Bogart as Blaine was an attempt by Warner Brothers Studios to distance their star from his usual gangster and bad guy roles and reinvent him as a romantic lead. He was a perfect choice. I have read that Ronald Reagan was slated for the part, but this is, in fact, bogus, and that the role was also offered to George Raft, who turned it down. This, it appears, is also not true. The role of Rick Blaine was always written with Bogart in mind.

                                 
                                            Humphrey Bogart as Rick Blaine, owner of Rick's Cafe Americain

I don't know what I could say about this film that hasn't been said better by film reviewers and historians over the years. The screenplay was based on an unproduced stageplay entitled "Everybody Comes To Rick's", written by Murray Burnett and Joan Alison and numerous changes were made to the original story by twin brothers Julius J and Philip G Epstein initially, before Howard Koch came on board to continue work on it while the brothers went on to write a propaganda war movie for Frank Capra shortly after the bombing of Pearl Harbour. The Epsteins returned to work on the final draft of the screenplay some time later. Some further rewriting was done by casey Robinson, although his imput is uncredited.

Normally, I tend to worry when too many writers are involved in the screenplay because it usually results in a convoluted mess, but this film seemed to have been charmed from the beginning. There's not a bad line in the entire film and every character is well drawn.Warner Brothers was well-known for its high production values and this film has a beautiful look to it, with some great cinematography by Arthur Edison.

SPOILER ALERT (for the six people out there who've never seen this film)

Film director Sidney Pollack once said that the best love stories are the ones where the lovers don't wind up together. I tend to disagree because that's what happens in real life and I want more escapism in my films. However, "Casablanca" has a perfect ending. Rick Blaine wants to end up with Ilsa, but he knows the more noble option is to let her go with Laszlo, since she is the thing that keeps the Resistance leader fighting his cause. Absolutely perfect.

OKAY, YOU CAN READ ON, NOW

It's easily been about five years since I last watched "Casablanca". I have the 60th Anniversary two-disc special edition on DVD and, whenever I watched it, I'd get a mad craving for a cigarette. I've been off them for a couple of years, but I'm not sure if seeing Rick Blaine in his white dinner jacket and holding an unfiltered Lucky Strike (or even better, a Fatima) may not resurrect the urge for a smoke.

One way to find out. See you in 98 minutes!

100 minutes later...

My God, everybody subsists on a diet of cigarettes and alcohol in this film! I gotta get my butt over to Casablanca. Thankfully, I didn't get the urge for a cigarette while watching this film.

Besides, Bogart did enough smoking in it for the both of us.

"Casablanca" is my all-time favourite film and yet, after this viewing, it's an even better film than I recalled. I've already mentioned Arthur Edison's cinematography. The lighting and composition of nearly every shot in this film is superb and it clearly shows the care and attention that Warner Brothers Studios were renowned for in this era of Hollywood film.

Bogart's performance is multi-layered and there are some subtle shifts in his facial expressions throughout this film that convey Rick Blaine's hurt and conflicting emotions once Ilsa Lund comes back into his life.

Ingrid Bergman's performance is rich and shows the difference in acting styles back then between American actresses and those with European drama training.

                                           Ingrid Bergman as Ilsa Lund

Paul Henreid as Victor Laszlo plays second fiddle to Bogart's Rick, but he needs to be seen as both a sympathetic character and also one whom Ilsa would leave Rick for. Henreid does well in his role. He also appeared opposite Bette Davis in "Now Voyager" (Dir: Irving Rapper, 1942) and there's a scene where he puts two cigarettes in his mouth, lights them both, and then hands one to Bette Davis. It is one of the coolest scenes I've ever seen and, back in my early smoking days, every attempt to replicate the move would end in laughter for anybody watching me. Here it is off YouTube.

HEALTH WARNING- Smoking is very bad for you AND this scene may contain plot spoilers;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-KGiwGn1d8

                                          Paul Henreid as Victor Laszlo

Claude Rains was a great character actor and here he delivers a wonderful performance as Captain Renault. In fact, this film has a beautiful array of character actors throughout, from Peter Lorre's brief screen-time as the oily Ugarte, to S.K. Sakall and Leonid Kinskey as Rick's employees, to Sydney Greenstreet as Ferrari, a shady businessman. And of course, there's also Dooley Wilson as Sam, the piano player at Rick's, whose rendition of "As Time Goes By" has become the stuff of Hollywood legend. Although, Barbra Streisand did a great little version of it in "What's Up, Doc?" (Dir: Peter Bogdanovich, 1972).

                                  
                                          Claude Rains as Captain Louis Renault

As mentioned above, I have read that the screenplay to this film was written in a very haphazard way, due to the working shedules of the writers involved. The Epstein brothers went off to do their patriotic bit for Capra and Howard Koch took over before they returned to the story a month later. It was even reported that whole scenes were being written on the day that they were due to be filmed. Either way, it's a great script, and, in 2006, the Writer's Guild of America named it the best screenplay of all time, and the American Film Institute have ranked "Casablanca" as Number 2 in their list of The 100 Greatest Movies. Probably behind "Citizen Kane", no doubt.

Perhaps it's because I'm a romantic at heart that I consider "Casablanca" to be such a great film. Perhaps it's because this film touches on notions of sacrifice for the greater good over one's own desires.

Perhaps it's because "Casablanca" is a perfect example of moviemaking from a time when story was important and scenes were given time to unfold.

I don't know.

All I know is that I watched it again a few hours ago and it's still in my Number One spot.

 #2

Picture courtesy of http://annyas.com

                            Directed by Howard Hawks,

             Columbia, 1940

              Screenplay by Charles Lederer

               Based on the stageplay "The Front Page"
                by Ben Hecht and Charles MacArthur.

I've mentioned this film before. It's one of the best screwball comedies ever made. I first saw it back in the late 1980s when it screened as a midday movie and I recorded it off tv onto a VHS cassette.

I played this film to death. I watched it EVERY NIGHT at around ten pm for ALMOST TWO MONTHS!

Once DVD came along, I kept an eye out for this film. I've bought two different copies of it on DVD, but the picture quality is not as good as the print that was screened on Channel 7 back in 1988. Why The Criterion Collection hasn't released a restored print of this classic film, I'll never know.

Cary Grant and Humphrey Bogart are my two favourite actors from The Golden Age of Hollywood. Back in the '80s, I was seeking out as many Cary Grant films as I could, keeping a lookout in the tv listings for screenings of his movies, hiring other films of his from my local video libraries.

This film was based on a stageplay, called "The Front Page", and had already been made into a movie back in 1931. It starred Adolphe Menjou as Walter Burns, newspaper Editor of a Chicago daily, and Pat O'Brien as his ace reporter, named Hildy Johnson. Johnson decides to quit the newspaper game to take a job in advertising and marry his fiancee just as a big story unfolds and Burns tries to keep him around to write the story so that his newspaper can get the scoop. The film touches on issues of race, reason versus insanity, and political corruption as a recently-unemployed man named Earl Williams is arrested for shooting a black policeman and the Mayor is looking to get him a death-sentence in a bid to garner public support for his office prior to an upcoming city election. This is a comedy?
There's more to the story, but I don't want to  ruin it for anybody who hasn't seen it.

This 1931 version is well-regarded,  and the film has since been remade a few times, in 1974 by the great Billy Wilder and starring Jack Lemmon and Walter Matthau, and again in 1988 as a dreadful film with Burt Reynolds, Kathleen Turner and Christopher Reeve. They moved it from a newspaper to a tv news station and it was called "Switching Channels", directed by Ted Kotcheff, but it is the 1940 remake by Howard Hawks that is considered classic.

The main reason for this was Hawks' introduction of sexual politics into the mix. Hawks decided to make Hildy Johnson a woman and this changed the dynamic between the two main characters. It was a master-stroke and the casting of Rosalind Russell as Hildy was perfect.
(EDIT 3/5/13- It was actually screenwriter Charles Lederer's idea to make Hildy Johnson female.)

The other thing that Hawks did was have his two main leads deliver their dialogue overlapping each other. As one neared the end of a sentence, the other would start talking, making for dialogue scenes that moved at a breakneck pace over the 92 minute runtime of the movie. This is a trick that was used often in the tv series "Moonlighting", starring Cybil Shepherd and a younger Bruce Willis, in the late '80s.

Cary Grant is in perfect form as Editor of The Morning Post, Walter Burns, who will stoop as low as he can to get what he wants and Rosalind Russell proves that Hildy Johnson is more than up to the task of deflecting his tactics. Like "Casablanca", the supporting cast is wonderful, with each actor creating a unique character of their own.

ABOVE- Cary Grant as Walter Burns and Rosalind Russell as Hildy Johnson. Do you know how hard I tried to find a four-button-functional double-breasted suit with wide lapels like that back in 1989? Impossible, short of going tailor-made, which I couldn't afford.

Here's a snippet from the screenplay (transcript) where Hildy is trying to tell Burns that she's quitting the newspaper game in order to get married.

                                                                                         BURNS
                              (still interrupting)
                         You've had a better offer, eh?

                                     HILDY
                         You bet I've got a better offer.

                                     BURNS
                         Well, go on and take it. Work for
                         somebody else! That's the gratitude
                         I get for --

                                     HILDY
                         I know, Walter, but I --

                                     BURNS
                              (ignoring her)
                         What were you when you came here
                         five years ago? A little college
                         girl from a School of Journalism! I
                         took a little doll-faced mugg --

                                     HILDY
                         You wouldn't have taken me if I hadn't
                         been doll-faced!

                                     BURNS
                         Why should I? I thought it would be
                         a novelty to have a face around here
                         a man could look at without
                         shuddering.

                                     HILDY
                         Listen, Walter --

                                     BURNS
                              (going right on)
                         I made a great reporter out of you,
                         Hildy, but you won't be half as good
                         on any other paper, and you know it.
                         You need me and I need you -- and
                         the paper needs both of us.

                                     HILDY
                         Well, the paper'll have to learn to
                         do without me. And so will you. It
                         just didn't work out, Walter.

               WIDER ANGLE

                                     BURNS
                         It would have worked if you'd been
                         satisfied with just being editor and
                         reporter. But no! You had to marry
                         me and spoil everything.

                                     HILDY
                              (indignantly)
                         I wasn't satisfied! I suppose I
                         proposed to you!

                                     BURNS
                         Well, you practically did! Making
                         goo-goo eyes at me for two years
                         till I broke down. And I still claim
                         I was tight the night I proposed. If
                         you'd been a gentleman you'd have
                         forgotten all about it. But not you!

                                     HILDY
                              (speechless)
                         You -- you --

She grabs something and chucks it at him. He ducks. The phone rings.

                                     BURNS
                              (to Hildy)
                         You're losing your eye. You used to
                         be able to pitch better than that.
                              (he reaches for phone)
                         Hello... Yeah... What? Sweeney? Well,
                         what can I do for you?

 picture courtesy of http://www.carygrant.net

                                  *****

Grant practically yells his dialogue throughout this film and it further illustrates his bluster and blowhard methods of going about things. Quite a difference from how the debonaire Cary Grant has often been seen on-screen.

I remember a quote from Ivan Hutchinson, who was an Australian film critic, when he was presenting another Howard Hawks film on tv. He said; "Hawks liked his men to be men, and his women to be their buddies."

This is true of this film. Hildy Johnson is seen as 'one of the boys', often referring to herself as 'a newspaperman'. However, it is the fact that she is a woman that lends this film some heart. Walter Burns and all of the reporters on his staff are indeed quite cynical and cold-hearted, but it is made clear early on that the news story that they are covering requires a woman's touch. I've always liked the way Howard Hawks drew his female characters. They were almost as tough-as-nails as the men, but they would always show their feminine side before the end credits.

"His Girl Friday" is a beautifully-shot film too. Cinematographer Joseph Walker lights every frame just right, which is another reason why it's a crime that this film isn't available in a better print. I've read that the rights to this film fell into Public Domain in the late 1960s and this accounts for the poor quality DVDs currently on the market. I think an e-mail to Columbia Pictures may be in order. Or maybe I'll type out a letter on my circa 1936 Smith-Corona Standard. They'll think I'm a crackpot.

There's also an elegance in the composition of the shots in this film. Nothing is accidental in the way that they are arranged.

The scene above occurs in the Third Act and looking carefully, you see that the candle-stick telephones on the table and the overhanging lights in the ceiling mimic Walter and Hildy. It becomes a little more evident a few moments later when they are both making frantic phone calls with their backs to each other and their placement in the shot is no accident. It's a long scene, filled with snappy, rapid-fire dialogue and it's a credit to the talents of Grant, Russell and Ralph Bellamy (as Hildy's small-town insurance salesman fiance, who arrives in the office) and how they seemingly effortlessly deliver their lines over one another and yet we, as the audience, are able to follow every bit of it. Absolutely manic!

I've noticed a shift in comedy films over the last ten or fifteen years. The Farelly Brothers got the ball rolling with films like "There's Something About Mary" (1998) and Judd Apatow has kept things flowing with his films in recent years although, in his defence, he doesn't resort to the same level of crassness. Two-thousand and twelve saw a 'remake' of "21 Jump St", directed by Phil Lord and Chris Miller, and, while the teenager in me found it somewhat amusing, the adult in me thought it struck a few too many low blows and easy laughs with its gratuitous use of foul language (and I swear as much as the next man, maybe more so) and crass comments. Remove the smut and it wouldn't be so funny.

It would be great to see a return to the kind of comedy film writing that doesn't rely so heavily on fart jokes and dirty talk. I'm no prude. It just reminds me of all the fart jokes and dirty talk that I heard from friends of mine back in my twenties.

It's a shame that there's no real middle ground between these types of comedy films and say, something like Woody Allen's output. Although, Allen's films have been a little hit-and-miss of late.

Nobody makes a good screwball comedy anymore. One that relies on clever dialogue that's actually funny too.

Thank God for films like "His Girl Friday".

**********************************

Well, this post got a little out-of-hand. I thought I would cover all five films, but it looks like I'll have to split it up into parts. And, of course, while writing this, I got to thinking about films numbers six to ten. That's a post for a later date, no doubt. Too many great films. And most of them are in black and white.

Thanks for reading! And stay tuned for Part 2.

CREDITS;

Thanks to Wikipedia and IMDB for info on these movies. Further and more detailed info can be found there.

Apologies for the little forward/reverse logo visible in some of the pictures. Saves me trawling the web for photos. Special thanks to those whose pictures I did use. Please don't sue. I'm a movie lover, like you.

"Hey Mrs. Teeritz, Would Your Husband Like A Couple Of Typewriters?"

Here's my daughter, furiously working towards a deadline on the first edition of  "The Cloud Pop Times". One key at a time.

Here's a type sample from her machine. Ribbon needs replacing.

 

The other typewriter, the Deluxe 750TR has certain design elements...

 

 

 

...that remind me of stuff like this;

 

Picture courtesy of http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/ralph%20mcquarrie?before=19

 

And here's a type sample. I'm not a fan of 'techno' or robot fonts. A little too moderen for my tastes.

 

 

And so, I'm happy to report that these two typewriters have indeed been put to good use. There was a day a couple of weeks ago and the sound of typewriters clacking away could be heard throughout the entire house. My wife was working on a short story on her computer.

"Quite the literary family", she quipped.

 

 

Thanks for reading!

And a very special thanks to ROG who gifted me these great typewriters. They're certainly being put to good use. Thanks again. ma'am!

 

 

 

***typecast (mainly) on a '66 Olympia SM9***

A Beautiful World...Still

 

 

 

 

One day a terrible fire broke out in a forest - a huge woodlands was suddenly engulfed by a raging wild fire. Frightened, all the animals fled their homes and ran out of the forest. As they came to the edge of a stream they stopped to watch the fire and they were feeling very discouraged and powerless. They were all bemoaning the destruction of their homes. Every one of them thought there was nothing they could do about the fire, except for one little hummingbird.

This particular hummingbird decided it would do something. It swooped into the stream and picked up a few drops of water and went into the forest and put them on the fire. Then it went back to the stream and did it again, and it kept going back, again and again and again. All the other animals watched in disbelief; some tried to discourage the hummingbird with comments like, "Don't bother, it is too much, you are too little, your wings will burn, your beak is too tiny, it’s only a drop, you can't put out this fire."
 

And as the animals stood around disparaging the little bird’s efforts, the bird noticed how hopeless and forlorn they looked. Then one of the animals shouted out and challenged the hummingbird in a mocking voice, "What do you think you are doing?" And the hummingbird, without wasting time or losing a beat, looked back and said, "I am doing what I can."

-taken from http://www.wangfoundation.net/humming_bird.pdf

"I'm not a protest singer/
 I can't write a song to send a message/
but it seems to me as if this message needed
to be sent."

-"What Are We Gonna Do?" by Dramarama
Lyrics by John Easdale


Thanks for reading.

A Recipe For The Dry Martini...According to Teeritz.

NOTE- 24/11/2014: This post was done a while ago and so those of you who visit regularly may have read it already. I reverted it back to Draft status because it had clocked up over 75,000 views, but I couldn't find the Traffic Sources. Which means to me that it's become some kind of spambot magnet or whatever the technical term is. I'm putting it back up now. We'll see what happens.

NOTE No. 2 - 23/5/2020: I have changed a few photos. I wasn't happy with the lighting in some of them. I may still change a few more.  

 

NOTE No. 3 -26/3/2021: Think I'll start editing the photos now. Some links are broken too, so I'll tidy those up a little. 

***************************************

I'll start this post by saying that I haven't had a Dry Martini since around 1992. As far as cocktails go, it's one of the more basic recipes out there. And yet, it's also one of the most potent.

In my humble opinion, anyway.

"A man must defend his home, his wife, his children, and his martini."
- Jackie Gleeson

It also has almost as many variations to its recipe as there are people on the planet (wow, what a party that would be) and these variations usually depend on the amount of Vermouth that is added to the drink.

Your purists will state the correct amount of Vermouth as something along these lines:

"After stirring the Gin in the shaker, pick up Vermouth bottle and, without opening it, wave it over the chilled cocktail glass. Then discard Vermouth in trash."

OR (even more stringent)

"After stirring Gin in the shaker, retrieve bottle of Vermouth from neighbouring room and return to doorway of room where you are preparing your Dry Martini. Stand in door-frame and wave Vermouth bottle once in the direction of the cocktail shaker. Then discard Vermouth in trash."

Your less adventurous Martini drinkers will advocate a recipe calling for 2 parts Gin, 1 part Vermouth. My own recipe leans more towards the Vermouth-in-the-doorway method.

"I like to have a martini, two at the very most --After three I'm under the table, After four, I'm under my host."

- Dorothy Parker

And let's not even talk of Appletinis, Green Tea Martinis and (Oh, my God!) Chocolate Martinis. Those are for children.

I'm talking about the Dry Martini.

From William Powell as Nick Charles in "The Thin Man" (Dir: W.S. Van Dyke, 1934)...

...to Cary Grant in "North By Northwest" (Dir: Alfred Hitchcock, 1959).

picture courtesy of http://www.glamamor.com/2011/03/inspiration-north-by-northwest.html

Okay, that isn't his drink in this scene, but he arrives at a meeting with plans to catch up on the drinking. Besides, it's such a cool photo, I just had to include it. I'd kill for a suit like that, although I did manage to track down a similar tie some years ago. The suit was made by Kilgour, an esteemed Savile Row Tailoring house.

Off-topic, I was driving my Mother's Datsun 200B towards a roundabout intersection back in November 1986 when news came on the radio that Cary Grant had died. I nearly hit a parked car.

A few days later, I was still miserable about his death and my girlfriend and I were meeting some friends for drinks that night. We were going to Mietta's, one of Melbourne's most respected fine dining restaurants. Of course, we weren't going there to eat. Prices were hefty and fine dining wasn't my thing, even though I was working in hospitality. I saw my fair share of polished cutlery and wine glasses on a daily basis, thank-you very much.

Nope, we weren't going to the restaurant. We were going to the bar, located on the ground floor of Mietta's and it was like stepping back in time. The decor was straight out of a 1920s English Drawing Room. All that was missing was Jeeves.

Dart-board sized tables with marble tops, a bentwood chair on either side. Larger tables against one wall, a black-lacquered grand piano near the left corner at the rear, incase anyone who knew how to tickle the ivories felt the urge to do so. And ashtrays. Because back then, you could smoke inside a restaurant or bar and provide atmosphere to the place. I kept expecting Noel Coward or F. Scott Fitzgerald to walk in.

Mietta O'Donnell herself was often to be found at the door to her establishment and she would greet you with a smile as you walked in. She was a well-respected figure in the restaurant industry and sadly, was killed in a car accident in Tasmania in 2001. Many have said that fine dining in Melbourne died on that day in 2001 as well.

My girlfriend ordered a Midori and Lemonade (it was the '80s, remember?) I ordered a Dry Martini as I opened my cigarette case and lit a Kent with my Zippo. Dear God, I was such a try-hard back then.

"I drink too much. The last time I gave a urine sample it had an olive in it."
- Rodney Dangerfield

And here's the thing about getting a Dry Martini at Mietta's in the 1980s. They served it in the correct cocktail glass. Have another look at that picture of William Powell in "The Thin Man".

Can't be bothered?

Okay, check out this still from The Tender Trap (Dir: Charles Walters, 1955)

picture courtesy of https://www.grubstreet.com | How The Martini Went From Simple Cocktail To American Icon Archive photo from Getty Images

Ol' Blue Eyes and David Wayne know their portion sizes. To me, that's the right size for a Dry Martini. And I'm not alone in thinking this;

http://www.thekitchn.com/3-reasons-you-should-choose-sm-137356

And so, I've spent the better part of the last five years checking thrift stores for cocktail glasses of similar size. About a week ago, I thought I should get around to writing this particular post, so I grabbed a couple of sherry glasses from a nearby thrift store because they were the right size.

SIZE OF THE COCKTAIL GLASS

I've got a standard cocktail glass. It's the one that everybody thinks of when they think of cocktails, especially the Dry Martini. And, as stated above, I picked up a couple of sherry glasses  because, to me,  they represent the proper size for this drink.

Here are the three of them;

The larger one (left) holds 150ml (5 oz approx) and the smaller sherry glass on the right holds 90ml (3 oz approx). Now, the idea is not to fill the glass to the brim. We're not animals, after all. You need to leave some clearance so that you can reach for the olive-laden toothpick without getting your fingers wet.

Remember how I said that I haven't had a Dry Martini since around '92? I was diagnosed with a duodenal ulcer a few years earlier and scaling back on alcohol was a necessity. Martinis were off my menu, but I did have a moment of weakness and mixed myself one at a party. In 1992. The ulcer was eradicated about ten years ago and hasn't flared up since. Well, actually, I've found that ultra high levels of stress will sometimes produce that old familiar sensation in my gut, but as long as I'm not called on to rescue a stricken nuclear sub off the ocean floor, I should be okay.

Anyway, onto the main ingredients.

There are many Martini drinkers and afficionados who will swear by Gordon's Gin or Tanqueray or Plymouth or some other, more exotic brand. I don't mind Tanqueray, myself, but I prefer Bombay Sapphire. Now, I'm no expert on alcohol. I can't taste pepper or oak in red wine. I can't taste the juniper berries used in Bombay Sapphire. I just like the taste of it. If you want to read more detailed articles about mixing drinks (I hate the term 'mixology') and various spirits and cocktails, then head over to;

http://savoystomp.com/ for starters. However, I've found a wonderful range of sites that deal with the bon vivant aspects of alcohol and drinking responsibly. Plenty out there.

And so, I use Bombay Sapphire Gin for my Dry Martinis. And I also use Noilly Prat French Vermouth. This is a Dry Vermouth, and it can be drunk with a mixer or used in equal measure with other spirits, but Vermouth is really rather more well-known as the 'other' liquid ingredient in a Dry Martini.

I will use a cocktail shaker that I uhh...'liberated' from a hotel bar I worked at a few decades ago.

That weird-looking thing with the spring around it is a cocktail strainer. It's gonna keep the ice out of my drink.

And then there's the olive. Although, whenever I've prepared one of these, I've always had a few olives on standby so that I can chomp on them while I prepare the drink.

"Happiness is...finding two olives in your martini when you're hungry."
-Johnny Carson

And use a good toothpick. Don't use those cheap-assed flat ones. They can tend to splinter and wind up jammed between your teeth. No fun.

Okay, so let's get down to business. I pour a small dash of Vermouth directly into the glass. It doesn't matter how much Vermouth you use because...well, it ain't stayin' in the drink, let me tell you. I swirl the Vermouth around in the glass, making certain to coat as much of the inside as possible.

Satisfied that there's a nice, thin coating of Vermouth inside the glass, I pour the rest down the sink. Thank you Noilly Prat. Your sacrifice will not have been in vain. And yeah, I know the glass has a cutesy floral pattern etched in it, but this was common in cocktail, brandy and sherry glasses of the 1950s.

"He knows just how I like my martini - full of alcohol."
-Homer Simpson

Next, I put some ice in the cocktail shaker. I was low on ice, but since I was using the smaller glass, I could get away with only needing four or five cubes. Besides, the gin wasn't gonna stay in the shaker long enough to dilute, anyway.

For this 90ml (3 oz) glass, I would be using 60ml (2 oz) of Bombay Sapphire. Given the conical shape of the glass, this amount of gin would get close to the top, yet still leave a little breathing room.

I poured in two 30ml measures and give the shaker a quick swirl for about ten or twelve seconds.

It was enough to put a chill through the gin and lower half of the shaker. Now, y'all know I'm a Bond fan and I have tried this drink 'shaken, not stirred' in the past. Once. Some of your hardcore Martini drinkers will argue that shaking will "bruise the gin" and what-not. I don't know about that, but what I do know is that shaking it will make the drink look cloudy when you pour it. BFD.

I will do a write-up on Bond's (or rather, Ian Fleming's) version of a Martini (The Vesper) at some point. But right now, back to this one.

The strainer is in place. The ONLY thing getting through it will be gin. Another reason not to spend too long swirling the shaker around is because you want to avoid any small shards of ice getting into the drink. No real reason, except that a Dry Martini should always look perfect.

After I poured it into the glass, I looked at it for a moment. I hadn't had one of these in two decades. The effect was somewhat shattered by the fact that I was preparing this drink on a black placemat draped over the top of the microwave oven in the kitchen. Better lighting just above the microwave oven. Long story, don't ask. However, that square of black cardboard taped to the kitchen tiles helped a little with the illusion.

And then, of course, I had to place the drink in an atmospheric setting for its final photo. I wanted to make it look like you-know-who had just dialled down to Room Service.

I took a tentative sip. And was transported back to that Friday night at Mietta's in 1986. That was a memorable Dry Martini. And so was this one. This one tasted as good as I remembered. And I took my time sipping it as I continued writing this post and transferring pictures from my camera to the laptop.

One more picture, without the soft-focus filter.

"I'm not talking a cup of cheap gin splashed over an ice cube. I'm talking satin, fire and ice; Fred Astaire in a glass; surgical cleanliness, insight.. comfort; redemption and absolution. 

I'm talking MARTINI."
-Anonymous

Now I wish I had written that.

Thanks for reading. And cheers!

EDIT, 20 mins later: Special thanks to Little Miss E for taking some of the photos for this post!